top of page
  • Facebook

Stay informed.

HB24-1007 Sardine Housing Bill Set for a 2nd Reading on Senate Floor and vote. 3/17/2024. Send in that email. Be heard.

Updated: Mar 17, 2024



ree

Colorado State Senate and urge them to vote no on HB24-1007. We’ve included all their emails at the bottom of this blog, so you can easily copy and paste them all into the “To” field of your email. It matters. Emails are like votes to politicans. They need to hear from us. We recommend copying your local media as well so they will inform the public about these concerns.


1. HB-1007 will badly hurt families. Families who rent have, at most, two wage earners.

They cannot compete with the combined incomes of 5, 7, or 10 unrelated wage-earning

adults. So households of unrelated people will always beat out families, in Colorado’s

highly competitive rental market that favors those with the most money for rent. Thus,

far fewer families will rent in neighborhoods, which will feed declining K-12 school

enrollment, and other problems. And for-sale home prices will also skyrocket, given the

much higher rental profit potential, post HB-1007. Rental investment firms and

speculators will buy increasing percentages of homes, and use them for rentals, post

HB-1007.


2. HB-1007 endangers existing laws concerning occupant and general public safety.

The sudden and dramatic increases in population density following HB-1007 will

overwhelm the already-strained emergency response routes in many cities near the

wildland urban interface, and those in flood-prone areas. In addition, HB-1007 will

overwhelm the infrastructure of many single-family neighborhood homes which were

designed for far fewer people. Note: larger multi-family, multi-unit dwelling situations

typically have 4” sewer lines exiting in the property. Single family neighborhood

residences typically have 3” sewer lines. Many such houses would be unable to support

the 10, 12 or more residents allowed under HB-1107. We will also likely see many hasty

“unfinished basement conversions into multiple bedrooms,” under HB-1007. Some may

be inspected by local building departments; others will not be. The likelihood of unsafe

situations developing (for the occupants) is high.


3. There is little proof that HB-1007 will lower per-person rents. Landlords and

property management companies run businesses. They will be the main beneficiaries of

HB-1007. It’s highly unlikely that they’ll benevolently offer quantity discounts, when

renting to more people. If current monthly rent is $1500 for each of 3 people, or $4500,

they’ll simply charge the same $1500 per person rate for 10 people, i.e., $15,000. They

may actually charge more per person, post HB-1007, with the realization that the

house’s infrastructure is more likely to be strained and require more upkeep,

maintenance, replacements, and repairs. A study of Austin, TX’s brief experiment with a

High Occupancy Unit (HOU) ordinance allowing 6 unrelated people per dwelling found

that per-person rents actually went up in the areas with the highest deployment of

HOUs.


4. Occupancy limits for unrelated individuals were created to “ensure the domestic

tranquility” in neighborhoods, and prevent out of control “Animal House” party

homes. We’ve all lived next to out of control rentals, and it wasn’t pleasant. Such

impacts will increase many-fold, once HB24-1007 prohibits any and all reasonable

occupancy limits. Occupancy limits serve as guardrails on out of control situations.

If the goal is increasing housing affordability in Colorado’s housing market, legislation

must include affordability requirements. Examples are requiring meaningful

percentages of affordable housing in new developments. There are ways of requiring

new commercial development to help fund affordable housing, too. The difference is

that these tools by definition create affordable housing. HB-1007 will not.

HB-1007’s sponsors erroneously place huge faith on back-end “noise and code

enforcement,” after problems develop. But enforcement response in most CO cities

is incredibly under-staffed and under-resourced. They can’t keep up with current noise,

parking, etc. complaints…let alone the exponentially greater incidents, post-HB1007.

And it’s frustrating, ineffective, and even dangerous to call authorities, given the

potential for retaliation and retribution.


Email addresses for Colorado state senators:

Please copy us, local and state media for transparency. Our email is: ColoaradoCommunityCoalition@gmail.com

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page